Why a labouring ancestor might be forced, in their own recorded words, to account for every move they had ever made.
If you've worked through the Ann Lefever case study in the Journal, you'll already have seen how rich a single settlement examination can be. This guide steps back to the whole system that produced documents like it: the Old Poor Law's law of settlement, and the family of records — examinations, removal orders, bastardy papers, overseers' accounts — that it left behind.
Responsibility for poor relief in England was placed on the parish by the Elizabethan Poor Law Acts of 1597 and 1601. Each parish elected unpaid Overseers of the Poor annually, who collected a local poor rate and used it to relieve the destitute — the elderly, the sick, widows, orphaned children.
Because relief was a parish's own local expense, every parish had a strong incentive to help only people who genuinely belonged to it. The Act of Settlement 1662 ("An Act for the better Reliefe of the Poor") formalised this: every person had one parish of legal settlement, and that was the only parish obliged to relieve them. A newcomer thought likely to become "chargeable" could be removed back to their own parish of settlement within forty days of arrival, unless they met certain exemptions.
Later legislation broadened and complicated how settlement could be gained. By the eighteenth century, a person could acquire settlement in a new parish by:
A settlement, once gained, generally lasted for life unless a new one was later acquired — which is exactly why settlement had to be investigated and argued over so often: a labourer's life of moving between parishes for work could leave real doubt about which parish, if any, still owed them relief.
When someone applied for relief — or was simply suspected of being about to need it — the parish overseers examined them, usually before a Justice of the Peace, and took down their own account of their life: where they were born, their father's settlement, every service, apprenticeship or tenancy that might establish where they legally belonged. This sworn statement is the settlement examination, and it is often startlingly autobiographical for a document of this period — written very much in the examined person's own remembered detail, even though it was recorded in the third person by a parish clerk.
Place and approximate date of birth; father's occupation and last known settlement; every period of service, apprenticeship, or property-holding since; marriage (and, for a woman, her husband's settlement); children, and where each was born.
Because a person's settlement could change over their lifetime — through apprenticeship, a year's service, holding office, or marriage — an examination can effectively work backward through an entire life history in search of the one parish still legally responsible for them.
If the examination concluded that the person's true settlement lay elsewhere, two Justices of the Peace could issue a removal order, directing the parish constable to convey the person (and often their family) back to their parish of settlement. Removal orders typically name everyone being removed, state the parish they are being sent to, and sometimes list the parishes they were to pass through en route — useful for tracing a family's movements even when no other record survives.
From 1697, a parish could issue a settlement certificate to a person moving elsewhere for work — effectively a guarantee that, if that person ever became chargeable in their new parish, the certificate's issuing parish would take them back. This allowed labourers to move for work without immediately triggering a removal, and certificates are a useful record of exactly where someone's parish of origin considered itself responsible for them.
Because an illegitimate child's settlement — in the absence of any other claim — fell to their mother's parish, unmarried pregnant women were also examined, specifically to name the child's father. If a father was named and could be found, the parish would try to bind him to a bastardy bond, in which he agreed to indemnify the parish against the cost of supporting the child. These examinations are often the only surviving document naming both parents of a child born outside marriage.
The Poor Law Amendment Act 1834 ("New Poor Law") reorganised relief around larger Poor Law Unions run by elected Boards of Guardians, replacing the parish-by-parish overseer system, and increasingly pushed relief toward the workhouse. Settlement examinations and removals continued under this new administration, but the records generated shift from individual parish chest papers to Union-level minute books and registers.
Settlement and bastardy papers survive very unevenly from parish to parish — some parish chests are rich in them, others have almost nothing. The main places to look:
Legislative dates and settlement rules checked against the text and dating of the Act of Settlement 1662, the Poor Law Amendment Act 1834, and guidance published by the Society of Genealogists, London Lives, and county record office research guides (Dorset History Centre, Gloucestershire Archives).
These documents are often written quickly, in a plain but cramped hand, and heavily abbreviated. Send me a photograph or scan for a free sample transcription.
Request Your Consultation